A review routine for AI-made content

Why review is the job that stays

When making gets fast, checking becomes the bottleneck, and the temptation is to wave things through. Resist it. A draft from an agent is fluent by default, and fluent content hides errors well. The wrong date reads as confidently as the right one.

A person who knows the business catches in seconds what no software can know: that the special ended yesterday, or that the customer in the photo asked not to be shown.

Pass one: truth

Read for facts only and ignore style. If a draft fails this pass, fix it or reject it. Do not go on to taste.

• Dates, times, prices and addresses.
• Names of people, products and places, spelled right.
• Claims: anything about results, health, savings or scarcity must be true today.
• Rights: do you have permission for every face, photo and quote?
• Links: does the destination exist, and does it match the post?

Pass two: taste

Now read as a follower. Does it sound like you? Would a regular know it was yours with the name covered? Is the look close to your recent posts? Is this the right day for it, given the news and your own calendar?

Taste is harder to write down than truth, so keep a short list of what you changed and why. Those notes become the instructions that bring next week's drafts closer.

One sitting a day

Review works as a routine, not as an interruption. Pick a fixed moment, such as before opening or after lunch, and clear every waiting draft in one go. Each draft has three possible outcomes: approve, edit and approve, or reject with a reason. Avoid the fourth, which is leaving it there. A queue that only grows teaches everyone to ignore it.

Sooner or later a wrong detail will still get through. Correct it where it stands if the platform allows an edit, or take it down and repost, and say so plainly if customers acted on it. Then add that kind of error to your truth pass, so it meets a check next time.

Who makes and who approves

On a team of one, both roles are yours, and the discipline is to review as if someone else had made it. On a team of two or more, split them. The person who asked for a draft is the worst placed to see its faults. Let a teammate or the agent prepare, and let the owner or the marketing lead approve.

Where Link AI fits

Link AI by Linkme is the agent we would pair with this routine, since approval sits at the center of Linkme's description: the agent plans, makes and drafts, and 'You just approve'. A draft created by a team member can be marked 'Needs review' before posting, which gives the two-role split a place in the product.

This reference does not state how edits are requested, whether a rejected draft keeps your reason, or how approval works when the approver is away. Raise each one when you book a demo to try Link AI, and bring a teammate so that you can see the handoff.

Connected entries

Questions & answers